Viewing 1 to 7 (7 Total)
Intel Embedded Processors

MikPel

Total Posts: 1
Joined: Jan 2010

18-35 watts is way out of the ba

18-35 watts is way out of the ballpark. We need something more like 1 watt, so we can put it in a small box with no fan. Sorry, Intel - you still don't get it.

Posted on 2010-01-13 08:31:20 at 2010-01-13 08:31:20

kevin

kevin
Total Posts: 84
Joined: Apr 2009

In this article (click here) Jim Turley looked at Intel's embedded processor offerings. What do you think?

Posted on 2010-01-14 18:09:31 at 2010-01-14 18:09:31
Display Messages: Threaded     Flat
6 Replies

Jo Kr

Total Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 2010

35 W? You are smoking something

35 W? You are smoking something. (Or you dropped a decimal, twice. smiling

http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=36331

2.5W...still 'way outside your margin, but not the 18-35W--that's laptop range. Unless you dropped that aforementioned decimal...but methinks perhaps your ARM tattoo is showing.

Posted on 2010-02-03 13:29:08 at 2010-02-03 13:29:08

Jim Turley

Jim Turley
Total Posts: 18
Joined: Dec 2009

Hey, that's good!

Hey, double-digit wattage is good for Intel! Sure, it's not for everybody, but given the arcane complexity of the x86 instruction set, it's an improvement. It's sure a lot better than the company's "non-embedded" x86 processors.

Posted on 2010-02-03 17:05:28 at 2010-02-03 17:05:28

Jo Kr

Total Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 2010

What I'm saying is looking at th

What I'm saying is looking at the product link on the Intel site, there's an Atom N270 with a Max TDP listed at 2.5W. That's the thermal design target, right?

Double-digits, sure, but with a '.' in between. smiling

MikPel's 18-35W was a targeted swipe at Celerons, (Conroe-L class, looking at the numbers on Wikipedia), which misses Atoms entirely. I followed the link you posted, Jim, and selected the embedded family to check. If s/he needs sub-watt, then certainly it's still too high, but 1.5x, not 15x.

-JK

Posted on 2010-02-04 01:02:28 at 2010-02-04 01:02:28

Tissit

Total Posts: 5
Joined: May 2010

These are still massive PC proce

These are still massive PC processors, but sometimes they get embedded. 486's did, and 186's for that matter.

You have to wonder about the writer though. Never heard of Intel? Now who was it that made the first microcontroller? Who designed the most deployed arch? All these strange numbers like 4004, 8048, 8051, 8031 and of course nobody ever used those i860 or i960 things. Or strongarm.

Posted on 2010-05-03 04:05:29 at 2010-05-03 04:05:29

NORCO2010

NORCO2010
Total Posts: 2
Joined: Jun 2010

This is Aggie from Shenzhen NORC

This is Aggie from Shenzhen NORCO Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd.
As a sales engineer in NORCO for 3 years and now I am locating promotion manager.

NORCO is a leading designer and manufacturer in the industrial computer field for many years.And is a member of Intel ECA Alliance. And Intel became one of the shareholders of NORCO in year 2009.

NORCO has a state-of-the-art R&D Center in ShenZhen, where more than 100 talent Engineers work together. And 9% of NORCO’s annual revenue is spent on R&D field. The strengthened capability of OEM/ODM is also a great support for NORCO’s brand.

NORCO has more than 30 branches in China, and three overseas subsidiaries in Singapore, the United States and the Netherlands. NORCO’s experienced technical and sales staff of its worldwide sales network will always be glad to serve you.

If you want to know more about embedded computer, please contact with me at Skype: aggiezhang8914382

Or, you could know more info from : http://www.norco-group.com

Posted on 2010-06-28 06:33:16 at 2010-06-28 06:33:16